The US withdrawal from the WHO isn't just a political spat; it's a strategic realignment that benefits Beijing more than Washington. Analyze the geopolitical fallout.
The US withdrawal from the WHO signals a tectonic shift in global health governance. This isn't just about pandemics; it's about the future of national sovereignty.
%2Fdepartment-of-communications-(dco)%2Fdigital-social-visual-(dsv)%2Fwho-logo-at-headquarters.tmb-1200v.jpg%3Fsfvrsn%3D34ba81d2_1&w=3840&q=75){kind=logo}
The US pulling out of the World Health Organization wasn't about accountability; it was about ceding global health leadership. Analyze the hidden winners.
The withdrawal from the WHO isn't about public health funding; it's a geopolitical power play reshaping global health governance.
Gavin Newsom is bypassing Washington to embed California directly into global health governance. This is the real story behind the WHO network move.
The paralysis of global health systems is real. Gavi's push for 'minilateralism' isn't collaboration; it's a strategic power shift we must analyze.
The historic WHO declaration on NCDs and mental health is here, but what's the unspoken truth about funding and corporate influence in global health?
%2Fco-chair-and-vice-chair-of-igwg-at-fourth-meeting.tmb-1200v.jpg%3Fsfvrsn%3D77fee812_1&w=3840&q=75)
Nations are rushing the WHO Pathogen Access negotiations, but the real fight is over intellectual property and global health equity, not just speed.